Ukjent sin avatar

Immediate effects of region-specific and non-region-specific spinal manipulative therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Om hvordan en detaljert klinisk undersøkelse egentlig er unødvendig…

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23431209

BACKGROUND: Manual therapists typically advocate the need for a detailed clinical examination to decide which vertebral level should be manipulated in patients with low back pain. However, it is unclear whether spinal manipulation needs to be specific to a vertebral level.

Both groups improved in terms of immediate decrease of pain intensity; however, no between-group differences were observed.

CONCLUSION: The immediate changes in pain intensity and pressure pain threshold after a single high-velocity manipulation do not differ by region-specific versus non-region-specific manipulation techniques in patients with chronic low back pain.

Ukjent sin avatar

Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain.

Om hvordan forskjellige behandlingsformer egentlig ikke har så mye forskjellige resultater på smerter…

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/14973958/

Spinal manipulative therapy had no statistically or clinically significant advantage over general practitioner care, analgesics, physical therapy, exercises, or back school. Results for patients with chronic low-back pain were similar.

Radiation of pain, study quality, profession of manipulator, and use of manipulation alone or in combination with other therapies did not affect these results.

Ukjent sin avatar

Samling av studier om diagnoser

En god samling studier som viser at diagnose-manien vestlig medisin og fysioterapi er bygd på ikke fungerer på mennesker med muskel og leddsmerter. (bare når det er snakk om seriøs sykdom som kreft og lignende)

Prevalence of annular tears and disc herniations on MR images of the cervical spine in symptom free volunteers.
“CONCLUSION: Annular tears and focal disk protrusions are frequently found on MR imaging of the cervical spine, with or without contrast enhancement, in asymptomatic population.”

Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic adults.
“We performed magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine on 66 asymptomatic subjects and found that 12 (18%) had either a disc protrusion or herniation. An additional 26 (39%) had a bulge that was associated with degenerative disc disease. We also found examples of spinal stenosis, narrowed nerve root canals, osteophytes, and vertebral body involvement with multiple myeloma. Degenerative disc disease is a common finding in asymptomatic adults that increases in frequency with age. It occurs more frequently in men and usually involves more than one level. The most common location is L5-S1.”

Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence.
“CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff tears are frequently asymptomatic. Tears demonstrated during radiological investigation of the shoulder may be asymptomatic. It is important to correlate radiological and clinical findings in the shoulder.”

Spinal Stenosis, Back Pain, or No Symptoms at All? A Masked Study Comparing Radiologic and Electrodiagnostic Diagnoses to the Clinical Impression
“Conclusions: The impression obtained from an MRI scan does not determine whether lumbar stenosis is a cause of pain.”

Ukjent sin avatar

You said biomechanics? Its «fuzzy» mechanics!!

Dekonstruksjon av biomekanikk paradigmet og hvordan det ikke passer inn i vår organisme.

http://www.maitrise-orthop.com/corpusmaitri/orthopaedic/mo64_fuzzy_mechanics/index.shtml

The acquired reflex to think according to Mechanics must absolutely be lost when dealing with Biomechanics. That is the reason why with some exceptions, engineers in Industrial Mechanics may sometimes be poor biomechanics. In fact, Biomechanics deals with a four dimensional space, where «the time dimension» does not have the same value as that involved in Industrial Mechanics.

Ukjent sin avatar

Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement

Stor studie om det aller meste rundt forskjellige diagosekriterier og individuelt det er fra terapeut til terapeut, men også fra studie til studie.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007427.pub2/full

Shoulder pain and dysfunction are common in the general population. A systematic review reported point prevalences for shoulder pain ranging from 7% to 26% with some indication that prevalence increases with age (Luime 2004a). Data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 1993 to 2000 indicate that one per cent of all office visits to physicians are for shoulder pain, and that a quarter of these visits are to primary care physicians (Wofford 2005). Moreover, shoulder pain has little tendency to resolve quickly or completely; according to a Dutch study, one half of all sufferers still report problems a year after their initial consultation (Van der Heijden 1997).

Impingement was originally characterised by Neer and Welsh (Neer 1977) as pinching of the soft-tissue structures between the humerus (upper arm bone) and the bone-and-ligament coraco-acromial arch of the scapula (shoulder blade) on movement. These structures include the contents of the so-called subacromial outlet: the ‘rotator cuff’ of muscles and tendons that surrounds the shoulder joint and the large lubricating sac (the subacromial bursa) that overlies it; and also the biceps tendon, which arches over the humerus, deep to the rotator cuff and within the shoulder joint itself. Neer 1977 proposed a continuum of impingement severity, from irritation of the bursa and cuff (normally due to overuse, and reversible by conservative management) to full thickness tears of the cuff. It has since been theorised that any abnormal reduction in the subacromial outlet’s volume (e.g. by bone shape, soft-tissue thickening, posture or minor joint instability) may predispose to, contribute to, perpetuate or aggravate this train of events (discussed by Hanchard 2004).

When a person presents with a history and symptoms suggestive of shoulder impingement, the clinician performs a series of physical (non-invasive) tests that aim to establish the diagnosis, and inform treatment and prognosis. Such tests may include the ‘painful arc’ test, intended to identify impingement in general terms (Cyriax 1982); tests to identify subacromial impingement (e.g. Neer 1977) or internal impingement (e.g. Meister 2004); tests to differentiate subacromial from internal impingement (Zaslav 2001); tests to diagnose rotator cuff involvement, including tears (e.g. Gerber 1991a; Gerber 1996; Hertel 1996a), or biceps tendon involvement (e.g. Yergason 1931); or tests to diagnose glenoid labrum tears (e.g. Kim 2001; Liu 1996b; O’Brien 1998a). These tests are described in Table 1, and include tests that were identified in studies included in this review.

Physical tests involve clinical and interpretative skills, and results have been shown to differ with testers’ expertise (Hanchard 2005). This has implications for the generalisation of results relating to test performance from individual studies.

Other tests, usually conducted subsequently and in secondary care settings by specialists, include ultrasonography, arthrography, bursography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). Those considered as potential reference standards for this review are described in Table 3. Some of these tests are invasive and none is completely valid (Dinnes 2003). Specifically, the generally accepted gold standard of diagnosis, direct observation at open or arthroscopic (‘keyhole’) surgery (Table 3), is not completely valid because tears within the substance of the rotator cuff are not directly visible (Fukuda 2003) and conversely, visible tears may be asymptomatic (Dinnes 2003; MacDonald 2000a; Milgrom 1995; Sher 1995). Surgery carries a risk of complications (Blumenthal 2003;Boardman 1999; Borgeat 2001), and is not applicable in the primary care setting where the majority of consultations and treatment prescriptions occur. Moreover, approximately 70% of patients with shoulder impingement respond to conservative treatment (Morrison 1997a) and so those having surgery cannot be considered representative (spectrum bias).

Whether intentional or unintentional, variations in index tests’ procedure or interpretation were prevalent, such that, as observed above, there were only six instances of any index test being performed and interpreted (in terms of criteria for, and implications of, a positive result) similarly in two studies; and no instances of three studies or more using any one test similarly.

Between-tester agreement

Few studies addressed this aspect, although it is fundamental to the validity of clinical tests. Agreement is best evaluated using the kappa coefficient, since this takes account of the fact that agreements may occur by chance. The coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, and interpretation has been recommended as follows by Altman 1991: less than 0.20 = poor; 0.21 to 0.40 = fair; 0.41 to 0.60 = moderate; 0.61 to 0.80 = good; 0.81 to 1 = very good. By these criteria, and based on point estimates, very good between-rater agreement was achieved for only one test, the biceps load II test (Kim 2001). Good agreement was obtained for the passive compression test (Kim 2007b) and resisted lateral rotation from neutral rotation (Michener 2009). Agreement for the painful arc test was moderate (Michener 2009), while that for Neer’s test was fair to moderate (Michener 2009; Razmjou 2004). For the empty can test (Michener 2009) and Hawkins’ test (Michener 2009; Razmjou 2004), agreement was only fair.

There is insufficient evidence upon which to base selection of physical tests for shoulder impingements, and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement, in primary care.The large body of literature revealed extreme diversity in the performance and interpretation of tests, which hinders synthesis of the evidence and/or clinical applicability.

Ukjent sin avatar

Pasient fikk 31 diagnoser

Artig artikkel om hva som skjer når 100 leger skal sette diagnose på samme pasient: 31 forskjellige diagnoser.

http://www.dagensmedisin.no/nyheter/-pasient-fikk-31-diagnoser/

Vanligste diagnose var psykiske lidelser, generelle uspesifikke helseplager og muskel- og skjelettlidelser. Flertallet ble henvist til psykologisk behandling, hos fastlege eller hos spesialist. Nesten 60 prosent av legene ga ulik hoved- og sekundærdiagnose.

Ukjent sin avatar

Are Chiropractic Tests for the Lumbo-Pelvic Spine Reliable and Valid? A Systematic Critical Literature Review

Nevner forholdet mellom eksperter og ikke-eksperters vurdering av menneskekroppen.

http://www.sherman.edu/research/archives/Jclub/Hestbeck_Lebouf_critical%20review.pdf

«This reviews shows that when comparing students with clinicians (eg, Harvey [1991] and Jensen [1993]), the students consistently did best. When comparing “experts” (ie, Rhudy [1990]) with ordinary clinicians, the experts did not produce better results than ordinary clinicians and in some cases produced worse results. This may occur because the clinician develops idiosyncratic standards for the procedure.»

Ukjent sin avatar

Neuromuscular strain as a contributor to cognitive and other symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome: hypothesis and conceptual model

Viktig studie om nervesystemet og bindevevets «adhesions» som bidragsyter til smerte.

http://www.frontiersin.org/Integrative_Physiology/10.3389/fphys.2013.00115/full

«Work by Brieg, Sunderland, and others has emphasized the ability of the nervous system to undergo accommodative changes in length in response to the range of limb and trunk movements carried out during daily activity. If that ability to elongate is impaired—due to movement restrictions in tissues adjacent to nerves, or due to swelling or adhesions within the nerve itself—the result is an increase in mechanical tension within the nerve. »

«This adverse neural tension, also termed neurodynamic dysfunction, is thought to contribute to pain and other symptoms through a variety of mechanisms. These include mechanical sensitization and altered nociceptive signaling, altered proprioception, adverse patterns of muscle recruitment and force of muscle contraction, reduced intra-neural blood flow, and release of inflammatory neuropeptides. »

«In our clinical work, we have found that neuromuscular restrictions are common in CFS, and that many symptoms of CFS can be reproduced by selectively adding neuromuscular strain during the examination.»

«As defined by Yunus, central sensitivity is “clinically and physiologically characterized by hyperalgesia (excessive sensitivity to a normally painful stimulus, e.g., pressure), allodynia (painful sensation to a normally non-painful stimulus, e.g., touch and massage), expansion of the receptive field (pain beyond the area of peripheral nerve supply), prolonged electrophysiological discharge, and an after-stimulus unpleasant quality of pain (e.g., burning, throbbing, numbness)” (Yunus, 2008).»

«These symptoms might be mediated by amplified central sensitivity, but peripheral factors, which have been described in FM and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), may also play a role (e.g., Price et al., 2009; Staud et al., 2009). »

«Staud has shown that local anesthetic injection into trapezius muscle tender points results in lower levels of thermal hyperalgesia in the forearm, consistent with peripheral nociceptive input as a contributor to central sensitization (Staud et al., 2009).»

«The interaction of nerve mechanics and function has been termed neurodynamics. As an example of the principles of neurodynamics, the median nerve elongates approximately 20% as the upper extremity moves from a position of full wrist and elbow flexion to one of full wrist and elbow extension (Butler, 1991). »

» If that ability to elongate is impaired—due to movement restrictions in tissues adjacent to the median nerve and its branches, or due to swelling or adhesions within the median nerve itself—the result is an increase in mechanical tension within the nerve. This adverse neural tension, also termed neurodynamic dysfunction, is thought to contribute to pain and other symptoms through mechanical sensitization and altered nociceptive signaling, altered proprioception, adverse patterns of muscle recruitment and force of muscle contraction, reduced intra-neural blood flow, and release of inflammatory neuropeptides (Lindquist et al., 1973; Kornberg and McCarthy, 1992;Shacklock, 1995; Slater and Wright, 1995; Balster and Jull, 1997; Van der Heide et al., 2001; Kobayashi et al., 2003; Orlin et al., 2005).»

«It is now well-established that manual stretch of nerves is capable of evoking increased sweating and alterations of blood flow in peripheral tissues, providing evidence of electrophysiologic activity in sympathetic nerve fibers (Lindquist et al., 1973; Kornberg and McCarthy, 1992; Slater and Wright, 1995; Orlin et al., 2005). Conversely, treatment of areas of adverse neural tension (for example in carpal tunnel syndrome, cervico-brachial pain, and osteoarthritis) leads to improved functional outcomes (Rozmaryn et al., 1998; Deyle et al., 2000; Tal-Akabi and Rushton, 2000;Akalin et al., 2002; Allison et al., 2002).»

«The most notable examples of these provocation maneuvers are ankle dorsiflexion, the passive straight leg raise test, the upper limb tension (or neurodynamic) tests, and the seated slump test (Butler, 1991,2000). Test-retest reliability is good for straight leg raise, slump testing, and upper limb neurodynamic testing. (Coppieters et al., 2001;Herrington et al., 2008

«Because it is not possible to differentiate completely between adverse neural tension and strain in muscles, fascia, and other soft tissues, we will use the more general term “neuromuscular strain” in this paper. »

«As shown on the left in Figure 1, neuromuscular strains and movement restrictions can develop as a result injuries and activities of daily life (for example, due to soft tissue and peri-neural adhesions around scars, contusions and fractures that reduce range of motion, anatomic abnormalities like scoliosis and kyphosis, overuse injuries, and others).»

«If the neuromuscular strains were not treated, and if the individual adapted to the increased symptom burden with decreased activity, then neural, soft tissue and muscular restrictions would be expected to worsen, leading to greater impairment and greater central sensitization. »

«In our clinical work, we have found that neuromuscular restrictions are common in CFS.»
«We have also noted that many symptoms of CFS can be reproduced by selectively adding neuromuscular strain during the examination (Rowe et al., 2013a,b). »

«Despite the elevation of the leg, which might have been expected to improve venous return to the heart and thereby improve blood flow to the brain, lightheadedness increased, as did visual blurring. Both individuals remained more fatigued than usual for 12–24 h. Thus, supine neuromuscular strain provoked increased fatigue and cognitive disturbance, the two symptoms not adequately explained by the central sensitivity hypothesis thus far.»

«We have observed that open treatment of these movement restrictions using manual therapy is associated with clinical improvement (Rowe et al., 2013a,b).»

«The hypothesis can be tested by evaluating the whether the response to a given neuromuscular strain differs between CFS subjects and controls with regard to immediate and delayed (24-h) symptoms, and with regard to measures of central sensitivity, such as changes in heart rate variability, or changes in pain sensitivity as measured by pressure-pain thresholds. «